Week 3 Sick Child Clinical Case Presentation
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
The purpose of this assignment is for learners to:
Have the opportunity to integrate knowledge and skills learned throughout all core courses in the FNP
track and previous clinical courses.
Demonstrate an advancing understanding of the care of women and children.
Demonstrate the ability to analyze previous patients seen in the clinical setting be able to perform an
evidenced-based review of their case, diagnosis, and plan, while guiding and taking feedback from peers
regarding the case
Demonstrate professional communication and leadership, while advancing the education of peers.
Integrate current evidence based clinical practice guidelines in the care of childbearing and childrearing
Appropriately apply anticipatory guidance and health promotion in the care of childbearing and
Assess growth and developmental milestones in the care of childbearing and childrearing families.
Construct an evidence based reproductive health management plan.
Identify and address healthcare needs of marginalized childbearing and childrearing families
For Week 3 of the course you will be presenting your own case from clinical. The case should be clear,
organized, and meet the following guidelines:
Initial Case Presentation:
Present only the subjective and objective data only on the patient organized as you would organize
them in a SOAP (CC, HPI (no OLDCART for HPI); ROS, PE findings, and any lab or diagnostic findings for
**Do not put the diagnosis or plan in initial post. No Assessment/Plan in the initial post. No citations or
references are required for your initial post, you will post references in your summary post.
WEEK 3: The case should be pediatric (a patient age 17 years or younger).
WEEK 3 specific guidelines: The case must not be something overly simple. The list of things that should
not be covered include sore throat, URI, UTI, ear infection, or contact dermatitis (poison ivy). You need
to present a case that intrigued you or presents new content in a different light. *One of the above
diagnosis can be presented if the findings were unusual and you clear such case with your course faculty
prior to posting (at least 2 days before posting). In the pediatric case you must also include in the
objective data growth chart percentiles for height, weight, and BMI, and tanner staging. A patient you
saw both for initial complaint and follow-up would be ideal, but not required.
Leading the Discussion: Post your subjective, objective, and diagnostic data for your patient by
Wednesday at 11:59 PM MT.
Interactive Dialogue: As a student you will also be required to respond to at least two (2) other students
initial case presentation. In your responses, you must include the following: Your top three (3)
differentials based on the information provided and why (rationale based on presentation findings), the
primary diagnosis you are leaning toward, how you would treat that diagnosis. Use references to
support your response. *DEADLINE – YOUR RESPONSES TO 2 STUDENTS ARE DUE BY FRIDAY AT 11:59
p.m. (MT). **If all students have a response, then choose the student with the least responses to their
Clinical Case Presentation Summary Criteria:
By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, post a summary reply to your initial post and respond to any faculty questions
to your initial posting or question(s) posed to the general class. Use references to support all of your
Criteria for Summary Post should include all of the following required elements: Summary post written
in paragraph(s) type format (No SOAP note for Summary Post); discuss primary and any applicable
secondary diagnoses along with treatment plan for each diagnosis. Scholarly and evidence based in-text
citation support for all of the listed diagnoses; Scholarly and evidence based in-text citation for each
treatment plan. Differential diagnoses are eliminated. Summarize your peer’s posts to your
*Remember not to use any patient identifiers in your posting (this would be full names or disclosure of
clinic name, preceptor name, et cetera). Please include age, gender, and race.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.