Time Management Assessment Essay Assignment
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Time Management Assessment Essay Assignment
Running head: TIME MANAGEMENT assessment 1
TIME MANAGEMENT assessment 2
Time Management Assessment
Student’s Name: Course Title: Leadership in a Diverse Society Professor’s Name: Date:
Time Management Assessment
Time management is one of the most important traits effective leaders should possess. Unlike money which can be recovered by the use of alternative means, time is the most valuable
since it is impossible to regain it once wasted. No single person has the power to stop, speed-up, or slow down time and, therefore, leaders should take great caution when managing their
time. It is important for leaders to learn this skill to be effective in their leadership. Time management assessment enables leaders to examine how they spend their time and identify the
various areas of their leadership that they need to improve on by implementing ways in which they can save time and stop wastage of time in their tasks.
Leaders should, however, be careful not to spend much time color-coding their duties, preparing time-saving spreadsheets or coming up with priority lists since they can end up in bad
habits or wasting the time they are trying to save. After conducting a time management self-assessment, I scored 27 points which showed that there were some areas in leadership where
I need to improve on. This research paper analyzes my time management self-assessment, the leadership theory that best describes my leadership style, and a comparison of
management and leadership.
The self-assessment results on time management showed that my time management skills needed to be improved by looking into the suggestions provided in the time management
assessment template. Most people lie between a score of 22 and 28 which shows that the individuals need to gather more skills in time management. Those who score between 30 and
36 are said to be excellent in their time management and are in a position to assist others to manage their time. A score of 20 and below would mean that the individuals are disorganized
and need to prioritize the acquisition of time management skills. The assessment template provides suggestions on some of the skills effective leaders should possess.
Leadership Theories on Time Management
Leaders face challenges in managing their time and in most cases, they find themselves having too much work to do while the available time is so little or having so much time that makes
them plan to do different tasks at a later date. There are several modern theories that can be used to help leaders get a solution for the ultimate problem of time management and enable
them to be more effective. These include the Parkinson’s Law, the Pareto principle, and the Pickle Jar Theory. However, the Pickle Jar theory clearly describes my leadership style.
This theory demonstrates how somewhat unimportant duties easily consume much of individuals’ time and prevents them from satisfactorily attending to more important duties (Mulder,
2017). An illustration of this theory includes a pickle jar that is filled with water, sand, pebbles, pebbles, and rocks. The inside part of the jar represents the available time while contents in
the jar represent the time management (Mulder, 2017). The sand represents the less important tasks in people’s schedules while the rocks represent the most important projects which
require more attention (Njagi and Malel, 2012). Leaders need to learn how to identify the more important tasks to give them more time.
Comparison of Management and Leadership
Leadership can be defined as the ability of an individual to influence the behavior of others (Northouse, 2018). In organizations, leadership enables employees to be motivated and work
towards the accomplishment of organizational objectives (Northouse, 2018). Leadership involves a high level of imagination where leaders are willing to take risks to achieve their goals.
It as people-oriented and focus on the achievements that individuals would have after undertaking various tasks. Additionally, leaders approach problems to provide solutions and
motivate others to formulate creative ways of solving different tasks (Northouse, 2018). Leaders focus on getting the right things done.
Management on the other hand, includes controlling and directing a group of people towards the accomplishment of a certain task (Drucker, 2012). Managers tend to focus on the goals
of the organization, maintaining the existing structures, and utilizing the available resources. Managers rely on their intelligence, analysis, and will. The most important part of
management is the accomplishment of tasks.
In addition, managers focus on the work being done and the expected outcomes rather than the individuals doing the work (Drucker, 2012). They manage individuals in an organization by
creating policies and strategies that are combined with ideas that are given to a team of individuals to achieve a certain result. Managers empower their subordinates by encouraging
them to give their views on various issues (Drucker, 2012). They are risk-averse and most follow the set guidelines to reach accomplish the goals of the organizations.
Time management assessment enables individuals to identify the save saving techniques as well as the activities that lead to time wastage. It is only possible to manage time well if an
individual is aware of the various acts which would be regarded as time wasting. Leaders should be equipped with skills to identify the various ways of saving time. Time saving activities
may vary from one organization to another depending on the activities that are undertaken in the respective organizations. Activities such as doing one task at a specific time, establishing
priorities, setting deadlines, avoiding and avoiding useless activities such as gossip at work may be helpful in saving time. On the other hand, procrastination, poor prioritizing, unrealistic
deadlines, poor planning, and poor organization were identified to be some of the factors that result in time wastage.
Drucker, P. (2012). The practice of management. New York: Routledge.
Mulder, P. (2017). Pickle Jar Theory. Retrieved  from Tools Hero: https://www. toolshero. com/effectiveness/pickle-jar-theory.
Njagi, L. K., & Malel, J. (2012). Time management and job performance in selected parastatals in Kenya. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 2(5), 19.
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice. New York: Sage publications.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.