Removing Cultural Blinders to Better Understand the Bible
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Removing Cultural Blinders to Better Understand the Bible
In their book, Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes: Removing Cultural Blinders to Better Understand the Bible, E. Randolph Richards and Brandon J. O’Brien set out to warn Westerners about the fallacy of reading Scripture with cultural blinders that may prevent them from realizing the meaning of what the author was conveying to his original audience. The authors identify nine key factors that cause Westerners and non-Westerners to interpret the Bible differently. Those factors are mores, race and ethnicity, language, individualism and collectivism, honor/shame and right/wrong, time, rules and relationships, virtue and vice, and finding the center of God’s will. They break the book down into three sections and use images of icebergs to help explain their claims. The three iceberg images are as follows; (1) In the first three chapters the authors describe the obvious cultural issues as being surface level glaciers, (2) The next three chapters are on less obvious cultural issues and are compared to glaciers that are below the surface but noticeable if looked for, and (3) The last three chapters describe the cultural issues that are not obvious at all and are like glaciers deep below the surface. The authors are convinced that without understanding these cultural differences it is unlikely that readers are able to correctly interpret Scripture. Richards and O’Brien share personal testimonies of their own cross-cultural experiences and observations in addition to biblical and historical data to help readers relate to what they are attempting to communicate.
Richards and O’Brien have put together an incredibly effective tool to help anyone learn how to interpret Scripture going against cultural preunderstandings or presuppositions. I find that I can only offer a positive critique on this piece of work. The offering of personal examples as well as many examples from Scripture itself kept me intrigued and eager to read more. There is a wealth of helpful knowledge that is presented in this text. Richards and O’Brien begin the book by bringing to light that readers come to the table with certain mores. They define mores as, “folkways of central importance accepted without question and embodying the fundamental moral views of a group.” These mores could lead us to the wrong conclusion of a text if there is not an understanding of the culture of the author. For example, consider the topic of money for a moment. The authors went into detail on just how different Westerners understand wealth compared to non-Westerners. They explained how Westerners view wealth as something that is available to anyone who works hard enough and for those who are lacking it is because they are lazy and how that is much different from how non-Westerners view wealth. They clarified this by saying, “There is only so much money to be had, so if one person has a lot of it, then everyone else has less to divide among themselves.” This, along with several other examples of words that have different concepts between Westerners and non-Westerners, helped me to remember to be intentional on first understanding cultural mores before attempting to interpret the Scripture.
The authors did a fantastic job of bringing awareness to cultural differences between Westerners and non-Westerners without being biased towards either. They simply explained in great detail that without acknowledging and learning what those
differences are we set ourselves up to misunderstand one another and therefore we will misunderstand Scripture. Both authors make this claim explicitly without any excuse. The method of breaking down the cultural differences into three levels of glaciers was masterful. This is a great visual and a powerful tool for the practical learners. Although I understood that my preconceived notions might inhibit me from correctly interpreting biblical and historical teachings, I did not realize the depth of this before reading this text. Now with the teachings and awareness brought forth from Richards and O’Brien, I know that I will be more intentional on understanding the author’s culture before trying to interpret heir writings.
I found chapter five to be one of the more intriguing chapters in the book. In this chapter, Richards and O’Brien tackle the differences between a right/wrong culture (Westerners) and a honor/shame culture (non-Westerners). I too have experienced this through my travels to Central Asia and working with Chechens there. They use these differences as another piece of evidence demonstrating how we cannot correctly interpret Scripture without understanding the cultural differences. The authors said this concerning a Western view of right and wrong, “Our point is that our decisions to act rightly are not necessarily made with other people in mind-to please others, for example-but on the basis of an objective and largely individual sense of right and wrong.” As the chapter continues they define the honor/shame culture that is found in non-Western cultures. “In shame cultures, people are more likely to choose right behavior on the basis of what society expects from them.” A family name is a virtue that is highly regarded and
honored in non-Western cultures. To shame your family name would be devastating to the entire family.
Richards and O’Brien presented a powerful case against attempting to interpret Scripture before learning about the culture from whom the Scriptures were written to and from. They bring enough evidence to demonstrate how the differing cultures can lead to differing interpretations but only one can be correct. Their argument is clear and to the point. It is presented without adding unnecessary verbiage to try and convince their readers of their opinion or by watering down their main points with an overload of general information. The flow of the book is well thought out and masterfully delivered. I found their work to be free of contradictions or inconsistencies that would cause their readers to question their claims. For only having nine chapters and a little more than two hundred pages, this book can equip readers as well as many others books of this nature that are twice as long.
It is important to understand that the only way we can truly understand God’s Word is through the power of the Holy Spirit. John writes, “But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things and bring to your remembrance all that I have said to you” (John 14:26, ESV). Then, with the help of the Holy Spirit, we should be diligent in seeking out other resources and tools to help us dig deeper. Misreading Scripture with Western Eyes by E. Randolph Richards and Brandon J. O’Brien is a must read for all students of the Bible. No matter what type of position one may hold, whether it be in serving in the ministry as a full-time vocation or being a layperson teaching Sunday school classes, this book will bring them great insight
into God’s Word. No matter or what level of understanding they may have of the Bible, this would serve as a valuable resource. When it comes to seeking God and understanding his Word, we can never have too many tools or too much understanding. Proverb’s speak to the importance of seeking understanding, “The beginning of wisdom is this: Get wisdom, and whatever you get, get insight” (Proverbs 4:7, ESV). By furthering our understanding of God’s Word, and by learning more about the different cultures and people groups that God has created, we can then better fulfill our purpose in life of loving God and loving others.
Richards, E. Randolph, and Brandon J. O’Brien. Misreading Scripture with Western
Eyes: Removing Cultural Blinders to Better Understand the Bible. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2012.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.