Psychology Project on Abnormal Psychology
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Psychology Project on Abnormal Psychology
You will demonstrate mastery of the following competencies in this project:
Describe the many types of psychiatric diseases and their diagnoses.
Describe the benefits and drawbacks of various strategies for assessing psychological disorders.
Compare and contrast various treatment options.
Jamal is looking forward to finishing his psychology degree, which is on the horizon. Jamal is looking forward to a high point in his academic career: the Psychology Department has requested him and a few of his peers to participate in a panel discussion that will emphasize their expertise on a topic related to abnormal psychology. Jamal is honored to have been chosen to speak at the event, and he plans to take advantage of the chance to add some priceless artifacts to his ePortfolio.
Jamal explores the significance of science and practice in mental health as he develops the subject of his presentation. Jamal also addresses the many scientific and psychological approaches to treating psychiatric problems, as well as the ethical implications of treatment. He also explores how social support might be used to enhance psychiatric condition education and awareness. Finally, Jamal analyzes how we might improve compassion and understanding for persons who suffer from psychological problems, as well as humanize (and normalize) aspects of abnormal conduct.
You will be presenting alongside Jamal for this assignment, and you must prepare a presentation that includes speaker notes. Your speaker notes will be aided by your Module Five Milestone, as well as your reading assignments.
Materials to Back You Up
Module Five Milestone: Before completing your project, review your milestone and milestone feedback. Reading: FAQ: How Do I Create a Powerpoint Presentation That Is Effective? Simple suggestions for preparing an effective PowerPoint presentation can be found in this Shapiro Library FAQ page. Project Two Template: This PowerPoint template can be used to create your Project Two presentation. Guide to Psychology Research: This tool was intended to assist you in locating psychology-related content. On page XV of the textbook Abnormal Psychology, the DSM-5 Quick Guide begins: This resource summarizes the numerous psychological issues you’ve learned about in this class. Purdue’s Online Writing Lab (OWL): This tool is designed to help you reference materials according to APA guidelines.
Choose a psychological disorder that you’ve learned about in this class and is interesting to you. To finish your presentation and speaker notes, you can use Google Slides or PowerPoint. When appropriate, back up your responses with trustworthy sources, and make sure your slides fulfill the rubric requirements stated below. In the speaker notes, describe each slide in 50 to 100 words (excluding transition slides). Remember to check out the Shapiro Library FAQ page in the Supporting Materials for tips on how to give a good PowerPoint presentation.
Introduce a psychological condition that interests you.
Describe how studying this condition has biological, psychological, and/or social implications.
Describe the clinical symptoms of this illness in a few words (e.g., diagnostic features, prevalence rates, biopsychosocial impacts).
Give a high-level summary of the points you’ll cover in your presentation. To format your presentation, consider using the subject headings listed below. Make your audience interested in your topic!
Use the following tips to create your presentation, as indicated in the Shapiro Library FAQ site referenced in Supporting Materials:
Prepare ahead of time.
Consistency is key.
Maintain a straightforward approach.
Keep it brief.
Complement the information you’ve provided.
Biopsychosocial Considerations (Part 1)
Discuss the disorder’s biological (e.g., neuroanatomical, neuroendocrine) correlates.
Discuss the disorder’s psychological (e.g., cognitive, emotional) correlates.
Discuss the disorder’s social (e.g., interpersonal) correlates.
Explain the impact of cultural differences on the diagnosis of the disease.
Explain how cultural differences affect the treatment of the condition.
Discuss how the community can help to increase access to treatment for the disease.
Part 2: Considerations for Diagnosis and Evaluation
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the clinical assessments used to assess the illness.
Discuss the difficulties of assessing the disorder’s reliability and validity.
Using the selected condition as an example, explain the principle of diagnosis by exclusion.
Describe how assessments help with diagnosis by exclusion.
Explain the relationship between the DSM publication process, the contribution of mental health research, and clinician practice.
Part 3: Therapeutic Points to Think About
Describe the benefits and drawbacks of various therapy options for treating the disease.
Discuss the value of non-pharmacological (e.g., complementary/alternative) techniques to treating the disorder.
Talk about how to strike a compromise between “do no harm” and “responsibility to treat.”
Summarize the most important points from your presentation.
Discuss the aspects of the condition that you want your audience to remember the most (e.g., biopsychosocial, diagnostic, therapeutic).
In what ways does the information you’ve contributed add to our understanding of the disorder?
In what ways does the information you’ve shared benefit our bodily, psychological, and/or social health?
What Should You Submit?
You must submit the following to complete this project:
A Google Slides or PowerPoint presentation based on the Shapiro Library’s frequently asked questions: How Do I Create a Powerpoint Presentation That Is Effective? For each slide, include 50 to 100 words of pertinent speaker’s notes. A minimum of 21 slides should be used, with sources acknowledged in APA format.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.