Principle of Net Neutrality Assignment schoolwork
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Principle of Net Neutrality Assignment schoolwork
Contribution quality will be assessed by the extent to which the commentary is thoughtful, engaged with others, illustrative of creative thought, draws upon lecture materials,
and integrates media content, first person experiences or current events information into the answers.
DISCUSSION TOPIC: NET NEUTRALITY
Background information and links
As discussed in lecture, the internet was originally conceptualized and developed according to the principle of net neutrality. That is: all companies, organizations or
individuals who want to distribute content to audiences through the web have equal access and ability to do so. The internet does not discriminate. Many say that this is
what made the internet such a wonderful place of innovation. This is how small, lesser known entities were able to create successful websites and businesses (and compete
with larger, older companies). But in 2013-2014, things were getting a little big bonkers. The big moment, as discussed in lecture, came in February 2014 when it was
announced that Netflix (the streaming movie service) was going to pay Comcast Cable Corporation extra money to get quicker download speeds to their subscribers. In
other words, Netflix would pay Comcast more for speed and quality. The Federal Communications Commision (at the time) issued a ruling a few weeks later that claimed
that this “pay for play” deal did NOT violate the principle of net neutrality, since Comcast wasn’t prohibiting Netflix from delivering its content, but rather was merely asking for
more money to deliver its content faster. So, the FCC said the deal was OK. Critics argued that the trouble with all this was that these cable companies (Comcast, Verizon,
Time Warner) OWN the mode of distribution (as discussed in lecture). They OWN the pipeline, so if they choose to require content producers to pay extra for access to the
pipeline, the democratic underpinning of the internet (embodied in Net Neutrality) falls apart. Comedian John Oliver did a marvelous bit about this on HBO in summer 2015.
Take 15 minutes to watch Oliver’s video WATCH/READ John Oliver comedy video HERE (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. .
Things changed dramatically with a historical ruling made by the FCC on February 26th, 2015. In a surprising turn of events… FCC Chair, Thomas Wheeler, announced that
FCC’s official ruling was to uphold the principle of Net Neutrality, reclassifying broadband internet as a public utility that would be subject to more regulation by the
The 2015 FCC’s stance on net neutrality was: No blocking, No throttling, No paid prioritization:
The one dissenting voice on the FCC back in 2015 was Republican Commissioner, Ajit Pai. His main objections to the ruling are summarized here: http://dailycaller.com/2015/02/27/net-neutrality-arguments/ (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
When Trump become president, he appointed Ajit Pai as Chair of the FCC. Pai, perhaps unsurprisingly, given his 2015 comments, repealed the FCC’s Net Neutrality protections last December.
So, NOW as of Jan 2019, Net Neutrality is NOT protected:
Here is a recent piece on the status of the Net Neutrality debate as of December 2018:
This is all new and changing in real time, folks!
In your discussion, feel free to draw upon your own experience as a broadband subscriber, information from lecture, and other info you might have from current events/news sources.
Below I have several different prompts to get you thinking about different aspects of Net Neutrality. Feel free to contribute in response to all of them or just a few.
Discus 5 questions
1.What do you think about the FCC’s most recent ruling repealing Net Neutrality in Dec 2017?
- Do you think the latest ruling on Net Neutrality would increase the gatekeeping powers of companies like Verizon and Comcast in a way that is unhealthy? Why or Why not?
- Do you think streaming services like Netflix should pay for faster speeds? After all, Netflix is a massive, bandwidth-sucking service. Maybe they SHOULD pay. Or, does Netflix paying for faster content delivery open the doors for all cable companies to charge content producers for use of their pipelines?
- What did you think about Commissioner Pai’s points, critical of net neutrality?
- What are your thoughts on John Oliver’s segment on the Net Neutrality issue? Was his argument compelling? Did he help clarify the issue for you? Was his construction of the issue fair?
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.