Order ID 53563633773 Type Essay Writer Level Masters Style APA Sources/References 4 Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
National Practice Problem Exploration
Addressing healthcare problems that have a large impact on individuals in our society, have been at the forefront of quality improvement initiatives. Identifying these areas of concern can be helpful for DNP prepared nurses to stimulate and create effective change that may be needed. One of the areas of concern identified is Opioid. Opioid use disorder is a national problem in the United States of America. According to the US Burden of Disease Collaborators (2018), opioid use disorder (OUD) is the number 7 leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. As a mental health practitioner, OUD and other substance abuse are common problems I see in my patient population. This national burden is directly related to my daily practice because most of the patient population seen in the clinic are also being prescribed opioids for chronic pain for various reason from other providers. In rural Tennessee where I practice, the small town is well known for drug abuse and drug overdose. I have learned from my previous collaborator, to be very careful when prescribing antianxiety medications or any type of control substance, since at the time I was the new provider in the area.
OUD impacts nurses as it requires a multifaceted approach involving various interdisciplinary members where a nurse may take a leadership position in the patient’s care (Eckart et al., 2020). As a profession, nursing science advances knowledge to recognize, prevent, and treat OUD (Eckart et al., 2020). Health care organizations serve as the umbrella to support multidisciplinary teams in treating OUD. Last but not least, quality of care could be affected by prescriber practices, social stigma, and lack of resources that correlate to OUD (Eckart et al., 2020).
A couple of crucial national stakeholders come to mind with OUD: the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). The CDC plays a significant role in providing OUD guidance for the public, including clinicians and patients. The DEA plays another vital role in monitoring and regulating prescribers plus controlled substance prescriptions. Micro level stakeholders impacted by the resolution of this issue include patients, as well as community members who have day to day interactions with the patients.
At this time, there is a clinical practice guideline (CPG) issued by the CDC. Clinicians in primary care have found that managing chronic pain can be a daunting task; therefore, the CDC has issued a CPG on prescribing treatment for chronic pain (Dowell, Haegerich, & Chou, 2016). Using a systematic review to assess benefits, risks, values, preferences, and costs, the CDC has issued 12 recommendations to clinicians when prescribing opioids (Dowell et al., 2016). The recommendations advise that clinicians avoid prescribing opioids if possible, take a stepwise dose approach if prescribing opioids is unavoidable, establish goals of treatment with patients before prescribing, and closely monitor patients for response to treatment; the recommendations also include avoiding concurrent use of other opioids or benzodiazepines, in addition to providing medication assisted treatment for OUD (Dowell et a., 2016).
The CPG provided the CDC has been a mainstay to patient education in my practice. My collaborating physician and I rarely issue opioid prescriptions. We often encounter frustrated patients when they are refused opioid prescriptions after having been given opioids from the emergent care setting; this is a time-consuming issue faced frequently in may primary care clinics (Tong et al., 2019). To improve patient safety and satisfaction, counseling is important to de-escalate patient frustrations and help them perceive the potential harms to opioid use.
I need a comment for this post at least 2 paragraphs and 2 sources no later than 5 years.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.