MSM 6645 Individual Final Project
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
MSM 6645 Individual Final Project
The final case is an individual project; you will develop a proposal to improve a process in your current organization or a previous organization. We talk about work examples as they apply continuous improvement and Baldrige from your experience throughout this course; your final project is an application of what we learn in this course and applied to a work situation based on your experience in a previous or past organization. Yes, this is probably unlike anything you have previously developed in a graduate course because it is a direct application that uses information from this class to help you improve a work situation through your leadership. The goal of this project is to create a proposal that you should be able to submit to your organizational leadership. In this process, you are writing a story or a case for continuous improvement.
You will identify a problem by the end of week three (and post this in the designated area of the discussion board) that requires a TQM/CI process improvement initiative through an organization with which you are/were associated. Remember: THIS IS A PROPOSAL – you will not be providing results and outcomes; instead, you are making a proposal that will include ways to measures for these results. I always direct students to choose a topic that is either good for your organization or good for your career. This is not busy work. Instead, this is meant to be a substantive piece that can be developed for work and can be used to help you enhance your opportunities for success; this proposal, when done correctly, belongs on a resume as a significant accomplishment.
Part 1 – Your topic
TOPIC PROPOSAL INSTRUCTIONS:
You should read all the instructions for the final paper first (this document). Your initial proposal for week 3 is much easier! Think about a process improvement of any type that would be beneficial in your organization and explain it in three or four sentences. I will respond, usually it is to ask for more information or to say go ahead and submit this for final approval. I am happy to discuss your idea on the phone if it helps, as many times as you need.
For final approval, post a paragraph in the assigned discussion board with your topic, provide a little background for informational purposes; explain which diagnostic model you are going to use as well as what process you want to improve (this is also problem-solving but with continuous improvement you will always be making things more efficient and more effective). Include a reference with your proposal in APA formatting. Explain why the model is appropriate; provide at least one reference that you are using. The purpose of the proposal is to make sure you have a clear idea of what you want to work on before you get to the project due date – plan your project early, this gives you plenty of time to develop your project. Please remember that your initial proposal is not graded, the final proposal is completed when approved. Be sure to complete both. Respond to your initial topic in the same discussion board with the information required for the final approval. You will not receive approval to move forward if you are missing your reference or your diagnostic model, or if the submission is incomplete. Do it right the first time; this is an important aspect of quality and process improvement.
Part 2 – Your individual Project:
You will develop the case by clearly explaining the problem and by building a continuous improvement proposal that you can use immediately by integrating assessment models, a SWOT, Baldrige, quality tools and proposed ways to measure outcomes (all of which we cover in discussion boards and readings/text). If you already have completed the change class (MSM 6635 or MGT 6681), use what you already learned. A list of required components as they relate to format and writing in general can be found in the project rubric and these instructions which will be used to grade this case.
The initial topic for this project must be posted by the end of week 3 to the discussion board that is designated for this purpose. Your final, REVISED proposal is due Sunday, week 4. Please use the instructions and include all the required elements, this is found at the back of the individual project instructions. Use the instructor feedback to assist you. You may change your topic later (should an opportunity present itself) but please check with me first. I offer the opportunity to discuss your project on a phone call, I urge you to take advantage of this.
Required Project Components:
You will use your textbook, a diagnostic model (from MGT 6681 or MSM 6635) the Baldrige Framework, a SWOT analysis, proposed quality tools and measures and Kotter’s implementation model:
- MBNQA – Criteria 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 (we do not use #7 because it is about results from all the other Criteria). Please note that Framework Criteria one through six are required, this is not optional. You may not pick and choose which ones you wish to use, is required that you use all of them except #7. Keep in mind that Baldrige is a systematic approach to continuous improvement, all the Criteria are separate elements of a systematic approach. If you leave out one, it is going to cause problems. Use this as a diagnostic model in addition to the 6 Box, 7S, or other model which I have approved (please ask first if you have another model in mind, as some are not appropriate for this project).
- 6 Box and 7 S diagnostic models (pick ONE)
o These are provided in Canvas if anyone has not had the MGT6681/MSM 6635 course yet. If you wish to use a different model and you have completed MGT 6681, please contact the instructor before proceeding and make your case.
- Kotter’s implementation model (8 steps)
- SWOT analysis –PESTEL is not an additional requirement, please see below.
o Please note that although the PESTEL was completed in the team project, it is not necessary to re-create it again in addition to the SWOT. All that is required is a correct SWOT. Because SWOT and PESTEL are new for many students, the PESTEL is used in the team project only to help students identify threats and opportunities because PESTEL is external to the organization as are threats and opportunities. Review your SWOT, make sure that your opportunities and threats are external – refer to the team project, if necessary, for assistance or contact the instructor. Make sure your Opportunities and Threats are correct, this is where many errors are found.
- Measurement instruments (existing surveys and other measures can be used, or you can suggest some from other sources – just provide an example). Because there is no way of knowing if we’ve made any progress unless we measure, at least two measures are required. If there is any confusion about this, contact the instructor. Proposed measures must be directly related and relevant to desired outcomes. Two basic measures include one of whether the work goal was accomplished, another one is how effective was the improvement process; since the proposal is for a work goal, these are two measures are for very different things. Please see the end of this paper for more information. Such measures are in addition to any proposals that include baselining and benchmarking. Use work measures if they are appropriate.
- Tools – We had a discussion board about tools such as Kaizen, 5 Ss, Kanban, etc. There are many tools that are available for continuous improvement efforts, select the ones that are appropriate for your project. Six Sigma is not the answer to everything as we have discussed. Do not count PDSA or DMAIC as a tool, because these are process improvement (decision-making) models as opposed to the specific tools you can use. For example, you might select Kaizen as one of your improvement methods once you have completed PDSA and identified specific areas that could benefit from some of the quality tools we discussed.
Good to know:
- Two example papers from students who completed this program successfully are available in the course. I strongly recommend that you review these for format, content, and sequence – these may help you develop your own proposal. Keep in mind that these papers are good but NOT perfect.
- This is a business proposal; it is not a typical “research paper”. There are differences!! Please contact me if you have any questions about the differences. For example, an executive summary is required instead of an abstract. An executive summary is a summary of the entire paper where you explain the issue, what you are proposing, and what you expect – this is quite literally a summary of your document in 2 pages or less. WRITE AN EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Do not write an abstract, do not tell the reader what you WILL do in the paper – if you must do this, you haven’t written it correctly. Instead, explain your analysis, your issues, and your recommendations. Above all, remember who your audience is! Use language that your audience would understand and remember that your audience is probably an executive with very little time so keep this short, complete, and concise.
- Do not write in first person (I, we, etc.). This should be written in third person so the focus is on improving the process.
- Never, ever, present recommendations before you have conducted an analysis or analyses. Recommendations are derived from issues, and issues are derived from models and analyses. Do this in the correct order or your proposal will not make any sense, and you will not like your grade.
You will develop a paper that is a minimum of 10 pages long, but no longer than 20 pages plus an executive summary (instructions for this are in the course), appendices, table of contents, references page(s) and a title page) all following APA requirements (title page, double-spaced, APA citations and references, etc.). When you are writing your own case, you first want to have the story clear in your mind; if this means you need to write it down, do so. Then review your case keeping the Criteria in mind looking to see where they fit. (Keep in mind that a textbook is not ordinarily used for references because it is, in and of itself, a huge list of information from references. However, in this course I will allow you to use your textbook as a reference with a maximum of four citations.)
You will need a minimum of 12 references, at least 8 of which must be academic articles, one of the remaining minimum must the Baldrige Framework. How to write the reference for the Framework is available in the document, use this for your reference format. You may use any articles in this course or you may find in the Troy Global Campus Library (as you know, there is a live link to the library on the homepage of Canvas; many useful articles are in the library guide for this course. Under no conditions is anyone allowed to use URLs to replace academic articles. In addition, articles taken from anything like or resembling Wikipedia, the Huffington Post, or any opinion website will not be counted, and the paper will be returned to you without a grade. TQM requires management by fact, not opinion and not hearsay. If this is not clear, please ask me about this under Ask the Instructor in the course and I will be glad to explain. Use your academic references to support your recommendations. This makes your proposal stronger because you are bringing an expert opinion. Your recommendations cannot be only your opinion.
Follow the same paper outline described in Team Project (title page, executive summary, introduction, background, current situation, implications, and conclusions) but remember to include a table of contents and the other items noted above.
Keep in mind that it is necessary to establish the background, the problem, and provide diagnoses before you can start recommending improvements or how to implement these improvements. AGAIN…never provide recommendations before the diagnosis because you cannot possibly know or discuss what needs to be improved without first having a diagnosis of what the problems might be.
Please see below for a list of required section titles and components in this order:
- Executive Summary.
- Title page with your name, table of contents, sections headers, APA formatted references, appendices and attachments as needed. Treat this as a business document, even though it is also partly a research project. (Table of Contents-use the feature in Microsoft Word, it’s much easier.)
- Background (always provide a citation on a reference for the organization, a website will do and know how to format this correctly. If you want to have the organization remain anonymous, please contact me. Remember your SWOT issues, diagnosis issues and recommendations need to align. Keep this alignment in mind when you work on issues and recommendations.
- A statement of the problem – identify the process/issue and why this is causing problems
- Diagnoses (identify the problems that need attention and explain why, this may be provided in a 3 column table- 1) issue, 2) why, then the 3) item – S, W, O or T)
o The SWOT analysis – this is the “big picture” analysis, the details should be included as an appendix, but you should provide a few key items in the body of the paper. Remember, if you have a problem identifying what is external for opportunities and threats, use the PESTEL model to assist you. Use the PESTLE for threats and opportunities.
o Diagnostic model 6 Box or 7 S diagnostic model or Nadler and Tushman’s model (pick one model, do not use all) – what do you see in this case? Apply a model. Identify and provide an analysis of the areas for improvement using your chosen model and explain what needs to be improved and why. Keep in mind this is also your discussion on how systems theory applies, and that your analysis and diagnosis will most certainly impact other parts of the organization. Do not pick and choose two or three parts of your diagnostic model, when you select the model you must use every part otherwise you are leaving out part of your diagnosis. Again, provide the key elements in your paper and provide the details in the appendices. You identify concerns in your diagnosis models which then translate into issues. Keep this in a logical sequence. Four frame is another option but contact the instructor first.
o Baldrige Framework 1-6: Use Baldrige to help you identify areas of improvement. Identify one area in each of the Criteria 1-6, being specific to identify what part of this Criteria applies in your situation. Do not use #7, that is only for the results, and we do not have results because this is only a proposal. Do not use the Profile included with Baldrige. The basic idea for proposing process improvement is to integrate multiple models because process improvement is complex and includes many aspects; demonstrate that you can do this. We do not use any of the evaluation criteria, this takes weeks of training and scoring is reserved for the Baldrige Evaluators. NOTE: Baldrige strategy #2 is the overall organizational strategy. Keep in mind that you might be dealing with lower levels of strategy such as operational strategy and tactical strategy (activities). These are appropriate, do not forget to make sure they have a relationship with the overarching strategy as described in Baldrige.
- Summary of the issues identified in the diagnoses (using SWOT and diagnostic model). Are your issues aligned with your recommendations and the KSF you identified earlier? Make sure they are.
- Recommendations to address the issues; address every issue identified
- Implementation – once you have recommendations, you are ready to propose your implementation with Kotter’s model. Provide some detail so it is specific to your environment.
- Explain what quality tools are proposed, be specific. Remember: PDSA and DMAIC are process improvement models and for the purposes of this paper they are not considered quality tools. If you recommend a process improvement model, it is in addition to any tools you propose. Review the tools discussion in the course if you need ideas or refer to your textbook or the videos in the course.
- Measures (2) + baseline or benchmark – Include at least one application of a baseline or a benchmark, and then address how you would 1) determine how you will measure to see how effective your process changes/improvements will be and 2) determine if customer satisfaction or stakeholder satisfaction has improved. One is to evaluate your process; one is to evaluate impact on others. Also discuss HOW will you use your data to make improvements. We just spent weeks talking about the need to measure, this is an important element of your final paper (don’t forget it, and don’t explain this by saying you’re going to do a survey – provide more detail). If your organization already uses measurement methods, you may include them here if they are appropriate. You may also search the Internet for better measures but provide citations and references from anything borrowed from another source.
o Do not confuse baselining and benchmarking.
o One baseline does not constitute a measurement, but several baselines in between changes and improvements can be a measurement. Ask the instructor if you have questions.
- Conclusions/Summary (What are your expectations for this proposal, and how can it help the organization?) Include any other comments you believe to be appropriate. Include comments about your expected outcomes.
ASK if any requirements are not clear!
Note: Include appendices in your paper so some items such as the diagnostic model and Kotter’s implementation model don’t have to be placed in the body the paper because they are usually large and will disrupt the flow of your paper. The appendices are for details, but key items MUST be included in the body of the paper, as readers should not have to flip back and forth between the paper and the appendices to figure out what the writer means. In addition, the SWOT can be an appendix, and you can simply refer to ‘Appendix XYZ’ instead of writing out all the information in the body of the paper – but key details are still needed in the paper itself. Let me know if you have any questions on this. If you use this as a business proposal, the appendices will be very effective in providing specifics for your process improvement proposal.
The instructor strongly recommends that as you progress through the course, you should be developing 1-2 pages on your topic area for each one of the criteria. In this way you will not have an entire paper to develop in the last 2 to 3 weeks. The old saying about “How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time” applies here.
Note: If you have not downloaded Grammarly, do so immediately and use it. It catches many errors. If you do not know how to use Microsoft Word’s table of contents feature, learn how to use it. You must have the 2021-2022 version of Baldrige, not an older version; this changes every two years.
A few examples are provided to help you see how these might fit into your final paper. Use your own judgment and use your own approach:
For Kotter, include a diagram or written steps that explain the model in an appendix with appropriate citations/reference (e.g., Appendix A). List the key points for your paper with that model in the appendix, be sure to include enough detail so someone else can implement your plan. When you come back to the paper, have a separate section with the title (maybe “implementation model and steps”) and a paragraph that explains which model you are using with appropriate citations and that details may be found in Appendix A. Based on the analysis provided in the appendix, these key points were determined as the central to the change and improvement effort (and then have a short explanation).
As you can see, this does not need to take up 5 to 6 pages when you can do it in 1 or 2. Likewise, for the SWOT analysis – and be sure to watch the videos so the difference is clearly understood between what is internal and what is external – put the diagram in an appendix along with the explanation and then refer to it in your paper with a paragraph. Whatever additional diagrams or figures you wish to use may also be included in the appendices if they are appropriately noted with an explanation of why they are included in your paper. This should save a significant amount of paper space. If this is not clear, please contact me. Remember that APA has rules for appendices. Keep in mind that most figures and diagrams belong in an appendix because they are often large and disruptive to the flow of the paper when placed in the body of the paper.
Note: When determining what types of measures will be used to determine 1) whether your continuous improvement process was effective and 2) if the goal was attained for whatever project – don’t just tell me you’re going to use a survey. There are many ways of obtaining information – surveys are overused. If you do include a survey, you must have another method such as a focus group, a post-project assessment, or anyone of many possible approaches. Feel free to use existing organizational surveys If THEY ARE APPROPRIATE – if not, what else would you do? Benchmarking and baselining are also types of measurement and may use in addition to the 2 specific measures, if there is any confusion about how to measure, contact the instructor.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.