Mentor Text Discussion Essay Assignment Project

Mentor Text Discussion Essay Assignment Project

Instructions:

Mentor Text Discussion Essay Assignment Project

Ask questions that resist simplistic answers

Avoid questions with binary answers (ex. this is good/ this is bad, Yes/no, Innocent/guilty)

Avoid vague or undefined words

Avoid questions that can be answered with traditional research methods

2)Pick a mentor text ( dont use the links you  can find these on google and if for some reason you can’t I’ll send you the PDF)

What should you do as you read?

Enjoy the essays. Yes, if you don’t enjoy it, find another essay.

Think about what the author is doing to build an argument. Think about what the argument is.

Think about what these very different essays have in common.

What kinds of topics do these essays choose?

What kinds of arguments do the authors make?

What kind of purpose(s) do these essays serve?

How do the authors connect with their audiences?

How can you see these common characteristics in the five essays you will have read? (The three you choose here and the two you have already read–Linfor and Koenig.)

Take notes if you want. You’ll share what you discover on the discussion board. That way we can kind of crowd-share the ideas you come up with.

By the way, ultimately you will choose one of these essays, Linfor, or Koenig as a mentor text for your personal essay.

Here is the list:

James McBride: “Hip Hop Planet.Actions” National Geographic, 2007. (There are no images on this PDF, but the actual version in the magazine has several photos.)

Michelle Zaunder: “Crying in H Mart (Links to an external site.).” The New Yorker, 2018.

Siddartha Mukherjee: “My Father’s Body, at Rest and in Motion (Links to an external site.).” The New Yorker, 2018.

Karla Cornejo Villavicienco Waking Up from the American Dream(Links to an external site.) New York Times Magazine 2021

Harriet Johnson McBride “Unspeakable Conversations (Links to an external site.)” New York Times Magazine 2003

Amanda Machado: “Traveling While Latino (Links to an external site.).” The Atlantic, 2014.

David Sedaris “Laugh Kookaburra (Links to an external site.)” New Yorker 2009

Paul Graham “HOw to Do What You Love (Links to an external site.)” 2006

Gloria Anzaldua “How to Tame a Wild Tongue (Links to an external site.)” from Borderlands: The New Mestiza 1987

Jenny Zhang “The Importance of Angsty Art (Links to an external site.)” The Rookie 2013

Weike Wang “Notes on Work”Actions The New Yorker 2022

Wesley Morris “The Power of Good CryActions” New York Times Magazine 2022

Anna Schechtman “Escaping into the Crossword PuzzleActions” New Yorker 2021

Roger Angell “Early Innings: Boyhood Memories of BaseballActions” New Yorker 1992

you will publish the essay in a magazine that publishes personal essays

Directions Simplified

What is your inquiry question? What is your answer?

What is your mentor text? Please note this must be one of the provided mentor texts.

Mentor Text General Observations: Create a list of at least five key features (use of evidence, rhetorical strategies, Reid strategies, organizational patterns, appeals) in your mentor text. For each one you name, answer the following questions: 1) How did you incorporate this into your paper? Be specific, pointing to specific things in the text. 2) Were there any you chose not to include? Why?

What magazine did you publish your essay in? (Please note that this must be a magazine which publishes personal essays.) (Please include a hyperlink to your magazine website.)

Based on who might read this magazine, who is your primary audience for this essay? Based on who reads this magazine, what do you assume this author believes about your topics? How did you appeal specifically to that audience?

What are you most proud of in this essay? Be specific.

What were your greatest challenges in drafting this essay? Be specific.

What rhetorical strategies did you use in this essay? What appeals did you hope this would evoke in your audience? Appeals and strategies are NOT the same thing.

Think back to the Reid strategies you wanted to focus on or the things you indicated you wanted to work on in this course? Name them. For each one, evaluate how successful you were in developing that strategy and why.

RUBRIC QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://termhomework.com/orders/ordernow You Can Also Place the Order In www.termhomework.com/orders/ordernow / www.essaysolver.com/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Mentor Text Discussion Essay Assignment Project

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Why Work With Us!!

• Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.

• We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.

• High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.