McDonald and US Minimum Wage Ethics Essay Assignment
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources
McDonald and US Minimum Wage Ethics Essay Assignment
Ethical Analysis: Should McDonald’s support an increase in the U.S. minimum wage?
You are the CEO of McDonald’s. This assignment requires that you use the Ethical Decision-Making Process introduced in Chapter 2, pages 35- 45 of your textbook to come to a decision regarding whether McDonald’s should support an increase in the U.S. minimum wage.
The first step in the Ethical Decision-Making Process is to determine the facts of the case.
*Please review the facts related to both sides of this question by using one or more of these resources:
on duct additional research on this issue in order to complete this assignment.
The second step in the Ethical Decision-Making Process involves identifying the ethical issues involved.
Question 1. Is there an ethical issue involved in this case? If so, what is it?
The third step in the Ethical Decision-Making Process is to identify the stakeholders and consider the situation from their point of view.
Question 2. Identify at least four of the stakeholders in this case. Use the Stakeholder Map in Figure 2.1 of your textbook, located on page 39, and the facts of this case to help you answer this question.
The fourth step in the Ethical Decision-Making Process is to identify/consider the available alternatives.
**IMPORTANT: For the purposes of this assignment, you will decide whether McDonald’s should support an increase in the minimum wage. Thus, for the purposes of this particular assignment, you should assume that the only alternatives are for McDonald’s to support raising the minimum wage or whether the company should support keeping the minimum wage the same.
The fifth step in the process is to compare and weigh the alternatives. During this step you should evaluate the impact of each alternative on each stakeholder you identified.
The questions below are designed to help you to compare and weigh the alternatives in this case. Remember the alternatives in this case are for McDonald’s to support an increase in the minimum wage or for the company to support keeping the minimum wage the same.
Question 3. What are the harms and benefits of associated with increasing the minimum wage to each of the stakeholders you identified in Question 2 above? Please provide the answer to this question in a chart per the example below.
Harms of increasing the minimum wage.
Benefits of increasing in the minimum wage.
Question 4. Use ONLY the harms and benefits to stakeholders you identified in Question 3 above to answer the following question: “Should McDonald’s support an increase in the minimum wage?” Base your answer only on the harms and benefits to the McDonald’s stakeholders you identified in your answer to Question 3. This question should consist of minimum of 150 words. You should consider both harms and benefits to each stakeholder and whether the harms or benefits to one or more stakeholders should take precedence over the others.
The fifth step in the Ethical Decision-Making Process – comparing and weighing the alternatives – requires that you consider various ethical theories, corporate values and individual values when coming to a decision on a question of ethics.
Question 5. Use two of the ethical theories discussed in this course to make an argument for or against the decision to raise the minimum wage. (those ethical theories/frameworks are Utilitarianism, Deontology/Principle or Rights Based Ethics, or Virtue Ethics). Please note that one ethical theory may lead to a different conclusion than the other.
Question 6. An analysis of the various alternatives when making an ethical decision also involves a consideration of the corporation’s values. Go to the McDonald’s website. Find the McDonald’s Code of Ethics or Mission Statement. Identify at least two of the company’s values. Use the two company values to make an argument as to whether McDonald’s should support an increase in the minimum wage.
Question 7. An analysis of the various alternatives when making an ethical decision also involves a consideration of personal values. You are the CEO of McDonald’s. Use at least two of your personal values to make arguments as to whether McDonald’s should support an increase in the minimum wage.
Step six of the Ethical Decision-Making Process involves making a decision.
Question 8. You are the CEO of McDonald’s. You have performed an ethical analysis using the Ethical Decision-Making Process found in Chapter 2 of your textbook (pages 35-45). Does your ethical analysis lead you to a decision to recommend to the Board of Directors that McDonald’s should support increasing the minimum wage, or support keeping the minimum wage the same? Why?
Please note that you should reference each of the following in your answer to this question:
1) The benefits and harms to stakeholders (use the information in your responses to Question 3 and Question 4 above);
2) The application of the ethical theories we have studied in this course (use the information in your response to Question 5 above);
3) The application of the organisation’s values (use the information in your response to Question 6 above); and
4) The application of your personal values as the CEO of McDonald’s (use the information in your response to Question 7 above).
As CEO, does your ethical analysis lead you to recommend to the Board of Directors that McDonald’s increase the minimum wage, or keep the minimum wage the same? Why? You must either decide to raise the minimum wage or keep it the same. Those are your only choices.
McDonald and US Minimum Wage Ethics Essay Assignment
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.