Leadership in a Diverse Society
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Leadership in a Diverse Society
Running head: CONFLICT MANAGEMENT 1
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT 2
Leadership in a Diverse Society
Conflict management describes the capacity to identify and handle conflict in a sensible, effective and efficient way. Conflicts can occur between individuals, groups or on organization levels. The ability to handle conflicts is critical in enhancing understanding and well-being between differing parties. Disagreements tend to happen in different settings including the healthcare sector. Apt management of the disputes is integral in provision of proper services. The incidence of conflicts and subsequent resolution emphasizes the role of leadership (Folger, Poole & Stutman, 2017).
Theories of Change
Change is an essential part of healthcare especially in face of conflicts. Change theories define the actions and processes that are linked to alleviation of conflict. The theories are frameworks and methods that aid the realization of dispute-free situations in healthcare. These aspects involve a series of events that enable achievement of a desirable outcome. There are different change theories that are applied in the health sector. The main theories comprise Spradley’s change theory, Lewin’s change theory and Rogers’ change theory. Other theories include Havelock’s, Lippitt’s and Reddin’s theories (Tappen, 2016).
Kurt Lewin developed the Lewin’s change theory which features three stages. These stages are unfreezing, changing and refreezing. The theory is widely applied in medical settings. It is established on driving and resistant forces. The change agent is the driving force while employees are the resistant forces. The process involves the creation of the mindset for change and then taking the necessary steps to implement the desired change (Udod & Wagner, 2019).
Spradley’s change theory involves a process of eight steps developed from Lewin’s theory. It puts emphasis on continuously monitoring the change process to ascertain a specific project successfully goes to completion. The first step is recognition of problem followed by diagnosis and assessment of alternative solutions. The next steps entail selection of change planning and implementation. The process rounds out with evaluation of the change and stabilizing of the outcomes (Udod & Wagner, 2019).
Rogers’ theory also has origins in the Lewin’s theory. Rogers modified the theory into a five-step process. The steps include awareness, interest, evaluation, implementation and adoption. The theory is mainly applicable in long-term initiatives. It draws success from the influence of colleagues in that the individuals who embrace the change earlier influence the adoption by other persons in later stages.
Conflict theories categorize the nature of disagreements taking place within an organization. The process of change is responsible for development of some of the conflicts. There is the organizational conflict theory which revolves around the relationships in the workplace. Disputes may occur due to interpersonal differences between workers in an institution. Issues may result from personal aspects or factors to do with personality differences. Conflicts can also come up between facets of an organization or between different organizations. Some of the disputes result in healthy competition between involved parties while in other cases the conflicts negate the proper functioning of organizations (Wehr, 2019).
Social conflict theory covers issues that arise between people. The disputes may occur as a result of individual interests between parties. It is a common aspect of living that persons will act in their best interest and this contributes to conflicts. Social conflict theory takes place when the desires of one party interfere with the desires of the counterpart. In most cases, the people involved have desire to get same thing. The situation is mainly observed when considering social classes. There are those who have the advantage and get to control much of the available resources or positions while the other group strives to attain the same position. Inequality underscores the essence of social conflict theory (Wehr, 2019; Udod & Wagner, 2019).
Leader as Change Agent
The role of the leaders as change agent is divers and comprehensive. The role is vital in successful change implementation but it also comes with challenges. Effective change takes place with proper leadership in place. The core responsibilities of the leader are to be able to make the change and enable others to follow suit. The leadership should incorporate guidance to establish the appropriate behavior to meet the requisite standards of performance by staff. Feedback is vital in setting the precedent for change implementation (Udod & Wagner, 2019).
The change agent is responsible for facilitation of the change process. The leadership provides encouragement to workers to increase teamwork and collaboration. The point of collaboration is to enhance shared decision making thus promoting collective contribution from staff. The workers are able to build on their innovative thinking and devise suitable solutions to problems. The leader provides inspiration through showing confidence in the staff and giving them props as important contributors to the process of change. A good leader and change agent develops partnership with employees. Adequate communication forms the basis of this partnership. Effective communication on the change should go both ways to ensure realization of the changes (Udod & Wagner, 2019).
Conflicts are a normal part of life. In healthcare disagreements can occur between colleagues, departments or whole organizations. There are several theories that define the conflicts and explain the nature of change that is put in place in light of these disputes. Capable leaders have the means of handling conflict through prompt identification and response to conflicts in the healthcare environment. Such leaders incorporate all stakeholders affected by change process and take the necessary actions to make sure there is successful implementation. Effective leadership goes hand in hand with capacity to handle conflicts. Leaders act as change agents through providing guidance facilitation and inspiration to staff.
Folger, J., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (2017). Working through conflict: Strategies
for relationships, groups, and organizations. Routledge.
Tappen, R. M. (2016). Advanced nursing research: From theory to practice. Jones &
Wehr, P. (2019). Conflict regulation. Routledge.
Udod S. & Wagner J. (2019). Common change theories and application to different
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.