Essay on Nuclear Energy’s Use
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Week 3 Conflicting frames of view Review: Part 1
The job is split into two sections: a pre-writing paper for this week (Part 1) and the essay for Week 5 (Part 2).
How frequently do you try to overcome tendencies towards your own point of view when looking for information regarding a certain issue?
This task asks you to play the “Create Game” in this part of critical thinking. The Believing Game is about “believing” the reasons of a contradictory position of a question or at least considering them.
During Week 2, you explored the preconditions stated in Chapter 2 of the site material and examined one of the subjects relating to the pros & cons of controversial subjects. You can utilize the same topic or discover another one in this discussion:
Choose one of these themes from Pros & Controversial issues, explain your stance and identify three premises (reasons) stated in the Pro or Con section, whichever is the opposite.
These “believing” questions provided by Elbow answer the three premises (reasons) which conflict with your position on the matter:
What is this point of view interesting or helpful?
If I believed this view, what would I notice?
What would this theory be true for or under which conditions?
Read the passage on processes of critical thought: The game, and how to produce more fruitful [PDF] conflicting views.
Practice your thoughts in order to examine them.
The document should follow clear and organized written guidelines:
Include a paragraph introducing and closing.
Tell the major concepts with a subject phrase and supporting phrases in the corpus paragraphs.
Follow standard grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and orthography rules in English.
There is no page requirement for this prewriting project.
At the moment, references to the assignment are not required.
The application of Strayer Writing Norms is required in this course. See the Strayer Writing Standards link on the left menu of your course for guidance and information. Check for further instructions with your professor.
The specific results of the course related to this task:
Talk about 5th Week Conflicting ideas of view Review: Part 2
How frequently do you strive to withstand distortions of your point of view when searching for facts regarding a certain issue?
This task asks you to participate in this crucial component of thinking.
Write a paper of 3-4 pages where you:
State your position on the subject you have chosen for the week 3 assignment, Essay: Part 1: Part 1.
Identify three premises (rationale) of controversial issues supporting your position and explain the reasons for your selection.
Explain the “believing” questions about your viewpoint in the three areas of controversial issues Explain your answers.
Examine at least two kinds of prejudices you have probably experienced when assessing your location for and against.
Discuss the consequences of your own enculturation or group identification on your partialities.
Discuss if after playing the “Believing Game” your thinking has changed, even when your viewpoint on the matter has remained the same.
For clear and organizing writing, the paper should follow guidelines:
Include the opening section and the final section.
Address the primary topics with a thematic sentence and phrases in the corpus paragraphs.
Comply with normal English language, punctuation, mechanics, and orthographic rules.
To support your writing, use four sources. Choose reputable, relevant and appropriate sources of information. Quite at least one source in your assignment specified on your source page. Access the library or examine library instructions for support of research, writing and citation.
The use of strayer writing standards is necessary for this course. Please see the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left menu of your course for guidance and information. Check for further instructions with your professor.
The exact results of the course linked to this task:
Examine the partialities involved in evaluating the premise of the particular problem.
Related premises to a position on a particular matter.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.