Defense Research Project schoolwork
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Conceptual Overview Peer-Review Response/Defense Research Project schoolwork
4.4 Research Project – Conceptual Overview Peer-Review Response/Defense
An important aspect of the peer review process is evaluating and addressing the recommendations of your reviewers. After the peer review has been completed on your conceptual
overview, address each of the comments and state how these comments will be addressed in the next revision (i.e., rough draft). Will you incorporate the recommendations? Did a
reviewer question bring a larger issue or consideration to light that you will not be able to explore as you further develop your project? Be sure to provide a thorough, well thought out
response to each comment. Keep in mind that not every peer review comment has applicability, so make sure you indicate and defend why you will not make changes to address those particular types of recommendations or questions.
Use this peer review response/defense table template to compile a list of all the comments and questions the peer reviewers provided. Provide a response (as described above) to each comment or question
Dear Writer, This is what you wrote for this assignment and down below is the peer review that was commented on this paper.
ISSUES OF UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS(UAS)
The UAS has been used over some time in the united states on a limited range. The use of UAS has been mainly used for commercial as well as military operations. This paper will seek to discuss the issues that have hampered the use of UAS in large scale.
There are small UAS that are cheap and can be afforded by many in the airspace. However, there are security risks associated with their usage. Safety and security concerns are huge. The
current designs of UAS are not capable of detecting other manned aircraft and therefore increasing the risks of in-air collisions (Valavanis, & Vachtsevanos, 2015). On another dimension,
the safety of current designs is not guaranteed as there are no robust measures of intervention in cases communication is lost between the UAS and the pilot’s headsets. This safety risk
calls for the usage of machine learning techniques on top of the internet of things. Besides, UAS may breach security of sensitive areas such as military camps.
Inadequate Data to Complement Technology
Despite the government agencies and other agencies concerned with the design of UAS collect data, the accuracy of data is compromised. Collecting data is a daunting challenge as the
issues of distance and speed from the pilot. Despite there being radar technology that can collect this information, theoretical and practical studies suggest that these gadgets are not
accurate(Zeng, Zhang, & Lim, 2016). Therefore, designing better and safer UAS gadgets becomes a challenge. However, there are more efforts aimed at collecting data meant to improve
Restrictions over usage of UAS is among the issues hampering the development of UAS. The control of the skies is an important affair and therefore has caused the federal
government and the state governments to get into tags of the war of who should control the skies. Local restrictions by the state governments are among the most pressing issues
(Linchant, Lisein, Semeki, Lejeune, & Vermeulen, 2015). UAS could be used for commercial purposes but the regulation for this technology is not sufficient to enable efficient development
The usage of UAS in the commercial, military, and other purposes have always seemed a bright idea. However, the design and regulation issues remain the biggest stumbling block to the usage of this technology.
Linchant, J., Lisein, J., Semeki, J., Lejeune, P., & Vermeulen, C. (2015). Are unmanned aircraft systems (UAS s) the future of wildlife monitoring? A review of accomplishments and challenges. Mammal Review, 45(4), 239-252.
Valavanis, K. P., & Vachtsevanos, G. J. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of unmanned aerial vehicles(pp. 2993-3009). Dordrecht, The Netherlands:: Springer.
Zeng, Y., Zhang, R., & Lim, T. J. (2016). Wireless communications with unmanned aerial vehicles: Opportunities and challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 54(5), 36-42.
Peer review or comment:
Your Conceptual Overview is apparent and easy to follow for the reviewer. I think this is going to be a significant research project for you. I agree and think there are limitations on UAS
application( this was one of my initial idea too), which mostly due to the limitation on regulation issue and safety concern as well (personally think it is design issue). FAA and other
aviation department are catching up on more detailed regulation for UAS. I think by clearly present the regulation from authoritative department that put a limitation on UAS will help the
reader easier to find your point. I hope you have a great time on this research project. Cheers.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.