Concepts of Accounting Information Systems
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Concepts of Accounting Information Systems
Read Case Study 12-22 Mar-Bal’s New ERP System (Analyzing an ERP Study and Implementation) on p. 383 in Core Concepts of Accounting Information Systems.
Write a 90- to 175-word response for each of the four questions.
12-22. Mar-Bal’s New ERP System (Analyzing an ERP Study and Implementation)
Access the full case story of Mar-Bal Company (the AIS-at-Work for this chapter) at www.iqms.com. Then in the search icon (magnifying glass) at the top and type in Mar-Bal Company. It will bring up several articles on the company. Then, respond to each of the following requirements:
- Review the items in Figure 12-10, which lists indicators that a company may need a new or upgraded processing system. For each item, provide a specific example from the case description. If the case does not address a particular item or it does not seem to apply, simply state “NA.”
- Review the items listed in Figure 12-9, which lists possible measures of the value of an ERP. For each item, provide a specific example from the case description. If the case does not address a particular item or it does not seem to apply, simply state “NA.”
- What are some of the intangible benefits Mar-Bal appears to enjoy from its new ERP system? Create a list with brief explanations.
- Mal-Bar’s case does not explicitly address the issue of business process engineering (BPR) that often happens when organizations install new ERP systems. Would you guess that none took place, or would you argue the opposite? Defend your answer.
FIGURE 12-9 Methodology for measuring the value of an ERP.
12.4 Selecting A Software Package
An organization has many choices when selecting accounting information systems. In this section we briefly discuss how managers and owners can recognize when they might benefit from a new system and how they might go about selecting one. Chapter 6 describes the general processes of developing new systems and selecting hardware and software in more detail.
When Is a New AIS Needed?
Believe it or not, many small businesses still keep their accounting records in a shoebox, filing cabinet, or similar storage, and their “accounting system” is really their tax preparer. But manual accounting systems do not allow business owners to analyze their data very much, guard against input or clerical errors, automatically generate financial statements or operating reports, or identify trends or opportunities to reduce costs or increase sales. For such businesses, a computerized system has much promise.
For those already using computerized AISs, there are many signals to business owners or managers that a new accounting software package, or an upgrade in software, might be a good idea. One example might be new regulations or legislation that requires new reporting documents. Another reason might be the need to comply with new rules or laws. A third reason might be pressures from competitors. Figure 12-10 lists 10 such signals.
1. Late payment of vendor invoices, which means late fees and lost cash discounts.
2. Late deliveries to customers.
3. Growth in inventories, accompanied by an increase in stockouts.
4. Slowdown in inventory turnover.
5. Increased time in collecting receivables.
6. Late periodic reports.
7. Increasing length of time to close out books at the end of a period.
8. Managers concerned about cash flows and financial picture of organization.
9. Manager complaints about lack of information needed for decision-making.
10. Owner worries about cash flows, taxes, and profitability.
FIGURE 12-10 Indicators that a company needs a new (or upgraded) AIS.
When a business owner or manager recognizes that it is time to purchase new (or more powerful) software, the next question is, “Which software should I select?” Here are some ideas.
Selecting the Right Accounting Software
Shopping-mall software retailers rarely sell mid-range or high-end accounting software packages. Instead, business owners and managers working in larger firms are more likely to purchase them from a value-added reseller (VAR) or a qualified installer. These companies or individuals make special arrangements with software vendors to sell their programs. They also provide buyers with services such as installation, customization, and training—services necessitated by the complexity of the software. A VAR offers a broader array of services for more software programs than a qualified installer.
The approach to buying accounting software varies with the complexity of the business and the software. For small businesses, the selection process is obviously much quicker and less expensive than when a big company needs an ERP system. Chapter 6 elaborates on this selection process and discusses some tools available to help make such decisions.
Large organizations with specialized processing needs may decide to build a customized AIS from scratch. While custom systems are difficult and expensive to develop, they are becoming less expensive with advances in object-oriented programming, client/server computing, and database technology. Custom systems are often more costly and take longer to develop than management anticipates, which is why most firms retain consultants to help with the selection and implementation of AISs.
Today’s accounting software is easy to use and feature-rich. Consultants usually find that packaged software can handle about 80% of a client’s processing needs. A company can ignore the other 20%, meet its needs with other vendor software, or develop its own modules to complete its system. Internet research and discussions with other business owners in a similar industry may be enough to help a business owner select a software package. Three helpful Internet sites are (1) www.top10erp.org, (2) www.2020software.com, and (3) www.ctsguides.com, each of which lists important software features, describes these items in detail, and allows individuals to compare software packages. These sites also offer software demos, make software recommendations, and provide detailed online software reviews.
Finally, because ERP systems can cost millions of dollars and take years to fully implement, it is always advisable to get the help of an expert when choosing one. Consultants can conduct a thorough analysis of an organization’s needs and determine which software vendor has the best solution and what customization the buyer might need. Companies should know that some consultants are independent, some work for specific vendors, and some are professionals who work in IT consulting firms or are specialists within large accounting firms. The best way to choose a consultant is to look for someone who has experience with your industry and who is familiar with more than one package. As you would expect, vendor consultants are unlikely to suggest solutions other than the ones offered by their employers.
AIS AT WORK An ERP Success Story at Mar-Bal10
Mar-Bal is a private company that makes composite plastic products and employs 350 people in four locations in North America. The company had all the classic earmarks of an outdated data-management system, including (1) the absence of convenient EDI portals for B2B uses, (2) the inability to create advanced shipping notices for customers, (3) the inability to scan parts production from its shop floors, (4) poor inventory control over vendor-sourced products, (5) manual data entry of inventory data, which introduced data-transcription errors into the system, (6) the inability to meet growing data processing volumes, and (7) limited forecasting and reporting capabilities. In addition, the company took manual counts of its inventory every month. Partially as a result, it took nearly two weeks to complete month-end reports, delaying vital information to managers and sometimes responses to customer inquiries.
To address these problems, Mar-Bal managers performed a systems analysis of its processes in order to better understand its system problems and to create a list of requirements for a new system. Given that the company was not in the software business and did not want to develop a customized system, its managers concluded that acquiring a new ERP system was its best course of action. After generating, and then narrowing, an extensive list of software vendors, the company eventually chose EnterpriseIQ from IQMS, which it first installed at the company’s headquarters in Chagrin Falls, Ohio and then later implemented companywide.
The new system is a comprehensive solution to Mar-Bal’s many problems. For example, the system now provides full EDI capabilities for both customers and suppliers and allows employees to process hundreds of electronic invoices per hour if necessary. Because the production facilities now use a compatible bar-coding system, managers can scan and track every single box or part in its four inventory locations, whether from manufacturing or from external vendors—an improvement that has eliminated its earlier, error-prone data entry system as well as the need to take manual monthly inventories.
Internal communication among employees has also improved with real-time monitoring of inventory—even from remote locations. Floor-level employees now use computer tablets to enter manufacturing data immediately into the system as they complete jobs. Similarly, sales representatives can view available inventory on an up-to-the-minute basis.
In addition to these benefits, the company saves time and money. In total, the company estimates that it saves $270,000 per year across its four plants. This includes $62,000 annually with its real-time production monitoring system, $30,000 in improved inventory control, and $23,000 in month-end reporting costs. The company also estimates that it saves $53,000 each year by eliminating the 2,750 hours of labor it once needed to take monthly physical inventory counts (which it now only performs once a year), and 5,000 hours of machine time (which it lost when making those counts).
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.