Comprehensive Field Case Analysis Essay
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Comprehensive Field Case Analysis Essay
Topic: comprehensive field case analysis
While completing Part 2 of your comprehensive field case analysis project, consider this competency: “Demonstrate Ethical and Professional Behavior.” To demonstrate competency in this area, you should be able to: Initiate and facilitate socially responsive and just practices across systems. Provide social work leadership within practice contexts and as a member of the profession. Cultivate and apply leadership qualities of self-awareness and other-awareness. Critique ethical issues within complex environments to formulate innovative responses and approaches.
Employ strategies of ethical reasoning in practice settings where policies or values conflict with the delivery of social work services, personal values, or professional ethics. Question, evaluate, synthesize, and apply information from multiple sources in framing a field-based issue, question, or problem. Question, evaluate, select, and implement appropriate assessment, intervention, and evaluation strategies in complex, fluid, multidimensional practice situations. Produce practice-ready presentations and documents. Demonstrate leadership in collaboratively examining underlying assumptions and developing inter-culturally effective policies, programs, and interventions.
Effectively navigate conflicts between diverse identities within and among individuals, families, groups, and organizations. Ethical and Professional Behavior (Part 2) Ethical issues can include anything from agency practice, personal relationships, and personal conflict with values or beliefs. You are encouraged to review the NASW Code of Ethics (Links to an external site.) before completing this section of your case study project. Use the following as your headings and note the details to include in your assignment. Ethical Issues identify at least one ethical issue that applies to your field case study. NASW Standards Identify which NASW standards from the Code of Ethics you can apply to the case. Diversity and Difference identify at least one area of consideration for diversity and difference for your case.
Evidence-Based Practices Identify at least two evidence-based best practices you would apply to your case to support culturally competent assessment or outcomes. For example, you could choose an intervention tailored to the cultural needs of your client community and/or you could select an intervention to improve the cultural competence for the social work staff at your agency in a way that supports positive outcomes for your client system. Field replacement information: Orientation to Agency Provide a brief description of plan for orientation to the agency. Student was given a tour of whole Fresno Center and the different departments. Ct was also given a tour to Living Well Center where she will be completing her internship. The student was also oriented to where she will be stationed with LWC.
Student was provided with policy and procedure, review documentation manual, and completing her Fresno County Managed Care credential process. Student had also completed HIPAA training and will be completing Fresno County documentation and Compliance training in order to be credential for billing. Student was provided with access to Fresno Center email, share folders, and access to client chart. Student is encouraged to join in session with other seasoned unlicensed clinician during session. Assessment of Student’s Prior Experience Write a brief assessment of student’s relevant education and experience. This information is to be used in developing student’s educational plan.
Student’s education and experience was reviewed. She has a diverse job experiences such as customer services to home care aid and internship with charter school as social worker intern. Her experience as a social work intern provides her with skills to conduct assessment and engage with other. She experiences in customer services shows will provide her skills to easily build rapport with clients. Student will be challenged both clinically and culturally with Living Well Center to provide services to our our under-served Southeast Asian population. The Living Well Center provides specialty mental health services to individuals that have serious emotional disturbances or serious mental illness and are in need of on-going community-based services.
The goal of the program is to increase the number of licensed mental health professionals of SEA descent with bi-lingual and bi-cultural capacity. Student will be given opportunity to work with clients individually and in groups to enhance her clinical skills. Supervisory Structure and Process Detail how the schedule and/or plan for the student and Field Instructor to meet for a minimum standard of one hour of supervision each week. Student will be supervised by LCSW weekly for individual supervision. LWC conducted weekly group supervision. During group supervision, we often discuss case study, discuss cultural and ethical boundaries, clinical documentation, etc.
Tools and Supervision Strategies Please list the teaching tools (i.e. observation, shadowing, videos, process recordings) the student will be expected to use during the field practicum. Please provide a brief description of each. Student will be able to observe other clinician conduct assessment and plan develop, individual therapy session, and shadowing others in the first two weeks. Student will be assigned to an unlicensed clinician and a minimum of 5 clients (who are under their assigned clinician). Student will conduct sessions with those assigned clients. Student will work closely with clinician and brief session with onsite supervisor. Any challenges and crisis will be reported to clinical director immediately. Student will discuss in supervision challenge they face during session. (Attachment is comprehensive field case analysis 1)
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.