Clinical and counseling psychology Literature Review
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read the Ryder, Ban, & Chentsova-Dutton (2011) Towards a Cultural-Clinical Psychology, American Psychological Association (2014) Guidelines for Prevention in Psychology, Hage, et al. (2007) Walking the Talk: Implementing the Prevention Guidelines and Transforming the Profession of Psychology, and Rivera-Mosquera, et al. (2007) Prevention Activities in Professional Psychology: A Reaction to the Prevention Guidelines articles. ALL THREE ARTICLES LISTED
Clinical and counseling psychology is a dynamic field that is constantly evolving and striving toward better treatment options and modalities. In this literature review, you will explore and integrate psychological research into a literature review, addressing current trends in three major areas of clinical and counseling psychology: assessment, clinical work, and prevention.
In your review, include the following headings, and address the required content.
Support this section with information from the Ryder et al. (2011) article Towards a Cultural-Clinical Psychology and at least one additional peer-reviewed scholarly article.
Compare the assessments currently in use by clinical and counseling psychologists.
Explain the trend towards cultural-clinical psychology and the suitability of clinical assessments with diverse clients.
Support this section using a minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly articles. The recommended articles for this week may be useful in generating your response.
Compare and contrast technical eclecticism, assimilative integration and theoretical integration.
Provide a historical context and identify the major theorists for each perspective.
Assess the trends in psychotherapy integration.
List three pros and cons for each perspective, sharing which perspective most closely aligns with your own.
Analyze the major trends in psychology and explain the connection between evidenced-based practices and psychotherapy integration.
Review the Guidelines for Prevention in Psychology (American Psychological Association, 2014), and support this section with information from the Hage, et al. (2007) Walking the Talk: Implementing the Prevention Guidelines and Transforming the Profession of Psychology, and Rivera-Mosquera, et al. (2007) Prevention Activities in Professional Psychology: A Reaction to the Prevention Guidelines articles.
Describe general prevention strategies implemented by clinical and counseling psychologists at the micro, meso, exo, and macro levels.
The Literature Review
Must be 9 to 10 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
o Title of paper
o Students name
o Course name and number
o Instructors name
o Date submitted
Must use at least seven peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text.
Must document all sources in APA style.
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style.
Ryder, A. G., Ban, L. M., & Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E. (2011). Towards a cultural-clinical psychology. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 5(12), 960-975. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00404.x
Hage, S. M., Romano, J. L., Conyne, R. K., Kenny, M., Schwartz, J. P., & Waldo, M. (2007). Walking the talk: Implementing the prevention guidelines and transforming the profession of psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(4), 594-604. doi:10.1177/0011000006297158
Rivera-Mosquera, E., Dowd, E. T., & Mitchell-Blanks, M. (2007). Prevention activities in professional psychology: A reaction to the prevention guidelines. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(4), 586-593. doi:10.1177/0011000006296160
Compares The Assessments Currently In Use By Clinical And Counseling Psychologists
Total: 1.50 Distinguished – Thoroughly compares the assessments currently in use by clinical and counseling psychologists.
Explains the Trend Towards Cultural-Clinical Psychology And The Suitability Of Clinical Assessments With Diverse Clients
Total: 1.50 Distinguished – Thoroughly explains the trend towards cultural-clinical psychology and the suitability of clinical assessments with diverse clients.
Compares and Contrasts Technical Eclecticism, Assimilative Integration, And Theoretical Integration
Total: 2.00 Distinguished -Thoroughly compares and contrasts technical eclecticism, assimilative integration, and theoretical integration
Provides a Historical Context And Identifies The Major Theorists For Each Perspective
Total: 1.00 Distinguished -Provides a fully appropriate and accurate historical context and clearly identifies the major theorists for each perspective.
Assesses the Trends In Psychotherapy Integration
Total: 0.75 Distinguished – Thoroughly assesses the trends in psychotherapy integration.
Lists Three Pros And Cons For Each Perspective Sharing Which Perspective Most Closely Aligns With The Students Own
Total: 0.75 Distinguished – Lists three pros and cons for each perspective clearly sharing which perspective most closely aligns with the students own
Analyzes the Major Trends In Psychology And Explains The Connection Between Evidenced-Based Practices And Psychotherapy Integration Using A Minimum Of Three Peer-Reviewed Scholarly Articles
Total: 2.00 Distinguished – Comprehensively analyzes the major trends in psychology and thoroughly explains the connection between evidenced-based practices and psychotherapy integration using a minimum of three peer-reviewed scholarly articles.
Describes General Prevention Strategies Implemented By Clinical And Counseling Psychologists At The Micro, Meso, Exo, And Macro Levels
Total: 2.00 Distinguished – Thoroughly describes general prevention strategies implemented by clinical and counseling psychologists at the micro, meso, exo, and macro levels.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics
Total: 0.25 Distinguished – Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.
Written Communication: APA Formatting
Total: 0.25 Distinguished – Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement
Total: 0.50 Distinguished – Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.
Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues
Total: 0.25 Distinguished – Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.