Benefits and Concerns of Stakeholders essay assignment
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Benefits and Concerns of Stakeholders essay assignment
Dudley (2020) points out that social work practice is usually embedded in programs. While you looked at practice evaluation using single-subject design in Week 3, this week, you shift focus to program evaluation. Program evaluation serves many purposes, including accountability to funders and to the public. Often, funding sources such as government agencies or private foundations requires periodic program evaluations. These evaluations can help provide answers to many different questions, and can contribute to improvement of services. There are a variety of program evaluation models that are appropriate for addressing different questions as well as facilitating the collection and analysis of many different types of data.
To prepare for this Discussion, identify a program within an agency with which you are familiar, which could benefit from process evaluation and outcome evaluation. You do not need to identify the agency in your post. Also, review the different evaluation models highlighted in this week’s resources (needs assessment, program monitoring, client satisfaction study, outcome evaluation, or cost benefit study).
BY DAY 3
Post a brief summary of the program that you selected. Recommend a program evaluation model that would answer a question relevant to the program. Explain the potential benefits of the program evaluation that you proposed (both process and outcome). Identify 2–3 concerns that stakeholders might have about your proposed evaluation and how you would address those concerns. Then explain 2–3 concerns that stakeholders may have about your proposed program evaluation and how you would address those concerns.
BY DAY 5
Respond to a colleague by doing all of the following:
- Identify the stage or stages of the program to which your colleague’s selected question relates.
- Suggest an additional question or concern that stakeholders may have about program evaluation.
- Recommend an alternative model for the evaluation.
Colleague 1: Katherine
RE: Discussion – Week 6
- Post a brief summary of the program that you selected.
A brief summary of the program that I selected is a day treatment program for adults with mental illness in the state of Arkansas.
- Recommend a program evaluation model that would answer a question relevant to the program.
A program evaluation model that I would use to answer a relevant question to the program I selected is program monitoring. This is used to monitor how a program is functioning that already exists.
- Explain the potential benefits of the program evaluation that you proposed (both process and outcome).
The potential benefits of the program evaluation, program monitoring, that I proposed would be the ability to track program information, improve future activities, or any behavior changes.
“What makes a process evaluation so important is that researchers often have relied only on selected program outcome indicators such as termination and graduation rates or number of rearrests to determine effectiveness” (Logan & Royse, p 225).
“Outcome or impact evaluation focuses on the targeted objectives of the program, often looking at variables such as behavior change” (Logan & Royse, p 226).
- Identify 2–3 concerns that stakeholders might have about your proposed evaluation and how you would address those concerns.
Some concerns that stakeholder might have about the proposed evaluation, which is program monitoring, would be, 1. It does not identify effectiveness. 2. It does not identify the overall outcomes.
- Then explain 2–3 concerns that stakeholders may have about your proposed program evaluation and how you would address those concerns.
Some concerns that stakeholders might have about the proposed program evaluation, a day treatment program for mentally ill adults, are 1. The cost-benefit of the program, 2. The need for that program.
Dudley, J. R. (2020). Social Work Evaluation (3rd Edition). Oxford University Press Academic US.
Logan, T. K., & Royse, D. (2010). Program evaluation studies. In B. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of social
work research methods (2nd ed., pp. 221-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (PDF). https://content.waldenu.edu/content/dam/laureate/laureate-academics/wal/ms-socw/socw-6311/artifacts/USW1_SOCW_6311_Week06_programEvaluationStudies.pdf
Colleague 2: Keshia Davis
RE: Discussion – Week 6
1.) Post a brief Summary of the program you selected.
The program/agency that I chose for this discussion would be one I am very familiar with, and worked at for over five years. This program is Tri-Development Center of Aiken County. This agency is recognized across the stat as one of the leaders in provision of services and support to individuals with disabilities. This agency advocates for resources and oppoerunities made available to people with disabilities in the Aiken County area, and in ohter areas of the state. This agency also provides residential and independently living services, work crew teams and day services for consumer, that promotes independence and good work ethics for those consumers whom are higher functioning.
2.) Recommend a program evaluation model that would answer a question relevant to the program.
My recommended evaluation model for this program would be client satisfaction studies. According to the text are crucial when evaluating the implementation of interventions (Dudley, 2020). A client satisfaction interview can be conducted with adults who have dual diagnosis of mental illness or mental retardation (Dudley, 2020). I think this model would be appropriate for the clients at Tri-Development particularly the higher functioning ones, and especially those living in the residential homes and out in the community who receive TDC services. I would ask questions such as Do you like staying in the residential or community homes? Do the staff take care of your needs and listen to your concerns?
3.)Explain the potential benefits of the program evaluation that you proposed (both process and out come).
The results of client satisfaction studies can provide helpful insights and other useful ideas about improving a program of clearing up clients misperceptions of programs, and results can offer several chances for service providers to engage in informal conversations with clients on topics for which they may have unclear views (Dudley, 2020). When I was the residential support manager for one of the residential homes I always met and conversed with my clients and staff to make sure everyone was comfortable interacting with one another or if there were any major concerns within the home that I needed to assist with or make changes to. I think this is very important to do especially working in an residential setting.
Identify 2-3 concerns that stakeholders might have about your proposed evaluation and how you would address those concerns.
Some concerns could be regarding clients not being objective about the individuals providing services for them, and could possibly blame the staff for problems that were their own. I had several situations such as this while working for this agency. Often times you had clients who would blame the staff for everything and vice versa. Therefore Upper management and higher ups would often think some staff were incompetent with working with intellectually disabled clients when issues such as this happen in the agency and residential homes, which could cause problems. I always strived to have a good rapport with my clients and staff. Therefore when issues arouse I would meet with both clients and staff, and sometimes privately just depending on the situation to figure out ways to improve the working relationships, and if it could not be resolved that way, I would seek guidance from upper management regarding the situation. In some cases I would transfer clients or staff to other residential homes day programs if the problems or concerns could not be resolved.
4.) Explain 2-3 concerns stakeholders may have about your proposed program evaluation and how you would address those concerns.
Other concerns regarding client satisfaction could be the client is fearful of disapproval from staff members, and clients may not be knowledgeable or understand certain questions ( Dudley, 2020). Again working in agencies such as this I encountered these type of situations, but I always informed my clients and staff if they ever felt afraid about an issues or person that they should always report it to me or any management personnel they were comfortable with.
Dudley, J.R. (2020). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do (3rd ed). Oxford University Press. Chapter 4, “Common Type of Evaluations” (pp. 78-95).
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME]and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.