Attitudes that are genuine and those that are not Philosophical Issues
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Answer ONE of the following prompts in an essay of 1,200 to 1,500 words. This assignment is due in DOC, DOCX, or RTF format on Wednesday, April 21st at 10 a.m. Pacific time. The paper must be written in a clear and concise manner, using proper grammar and punctuation, and following the standard Philosophy paper format.
1. Discuss Soren Kierkegaard’s perspective on the relationship between faith and reason. Discuss whether he is correct in choosing faith over reason.
2. Describe and critically evaluate Friedrich Nietzsche’s perspective on how we should conduct a “reevaluation of values” to determine which morality to follow in our daily lives.
3. According to Martin Heidegger, what is the difference between authentic and inauthentic attitudes toward death? Consider whether a genuine attitude toward death is required to live a meaningful life.
4. Describe what Jean-Paul Sartre means when he says, “Hell is other people.” Examine whether he is correct in his assertions.
5. Describe Simone de Beauvoir’s perspective on what it means to be a woman. Examine whether and/or to what extent her analysis is still valid today.
6. According to Albert Camus, how is the myth of Sisyphus an allegory for all human existence? Examine whether he is correct in his assertion that all human life is relevantly similar to Sisyphus’s situation.
Here are some pointers to keep in mind:
Identify the topic/question, inform the reader of the position you will be arguing for, and provide an outline of your paper in your introduction.
What your introduction should not do is include non-essential information (for example, a biography of the philosopher), or begin to provide argument or analysis.
In philosophy papers, self-reference is acceptable, even preferred (e.g., I will argue that…).
Use rhetorical questions sparingly (asked but unanswered). If you want to make a point, say it out loud. In general, only one question should be asked at a time. Make certain that you respond to the specific prompt and not something vaguely related to it. Also, make sure you answer all of the prompt’s questions. Repetition should be avoided (except for your introduction & conclusion). If you find yourself repeating yourself, rethink your paper’s structure. When explaining a philosophical theory, argument, example, or other concept, try to figure out what the most general or abstract point is intended to convey. Jargon tips: In a philosophy paper, “valid” means “follows logically from the premises,” not “true” or “plausible.” To “beg the question,” or “assume your conclusion in your premises,” is to argue in circles. It does not imply that the question is being asked. If you make any claims about a philosopher’s views that aren’t self-evident, you should back them up with a page reference. Every philosophy paper (at least for this course) should include a critical discussion. A careful and balanced critical discussion is required for a good critical discussion. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t take sides, but it does mean you should always consider what an intelligent opponent might say in reply to your points or arguments, and respond accordingly. Write confidently and assertively when making claims and conclusions; don’t start every sentence with “I believe” or “In my opinion,” etc. If you ever write “I believe…”, you should follow up with “Because…”. When referring to humanity, avoid using the words “man” or “mankind”; gender-neutral language is now the norm and expectation in academic writing. Use terms like “people” and “humans” when referring to humanity in general. You can use gender-neutral terms like “they” or alternate between “he” and “she” when talking about generic human individuals (while staying consistent within a single example). Don’t overextend yourself. It is preferable to go over a few key points in depth rather than skim over a large number of topics.
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.