642 hello fresh part of Schedule / Milestone Chart
Assignment ID Number AFFGEHU83939HD Type of Document Essay Writing Format APA/MLA/Harvard Academic Level Masters/University References/Sources 4 References
Description / paper instructions
what you need do is this part.
Schedule / Milestone Chart (Joe) YES Can be included as an MS-Project file, but suggest that you draw the most significant visual elements for the presentation, perhaps using the Milestone chart
In example it is 4.0 Sequence and Schedule
Team Assignment – Project Plan Report and Team Presentation
File OregonStateU-RiskRegister.xlsx (211.069 KB)
File Solar Array Project – Paradise, CA – FINAL PAPER – example Project Plan Report.pdf (2.953 MB)
File Communications Matrix Template – Excel Format.xls (52.5 KB)
File Items to include in Project Management Plan.docx (15.369 KB)
Final project submission. See PDF Syllabus, main elements included here for your convenience:
Final Project Plan Report Submission (32 Points)
The main outcome of your work in this course (as a team) is a collection of project elements from a project management plan, to be submitted in the form of a Summary Report which shows key stakeholders that your team has a solid project plan in place for executing their project. So it should be more than a simple collection of files, the report should flow and indicate how the various project tools and artifacts (charter, budget, Gantt Chart, Risk Register, Communications Matrix, etc.) flow and how they illustrate the strength of your plan. The instructor will provide a definitive list of the elements which are required and which may be optionally included. This is the single largest portion of your grade and the intent is to have students deliver something which is academically sophisticated and also is reflective of what project managers must actually deliver in their organizations. To further assist students, the instructor will provide, where appropriate, examples and templates to aid in the creation of these project management plan elements (example: a risk register and heat map).
Below is a template for creating a heat map and separately another file that has both a heat map and risk register. Use them as you choose.
Heatmap – REM.xlsx
The grading breakdown for the points in the Final Project is shown below.
Section of Project Plan Report
Given more points because it is the illustration of scope
The hand-drawn network should be included as an appendix, make sure you include the computer-generated Network Diagram
MS-Project or other software provides this advisable to attach the .mpp file
Cost Baseline (Budget)
Cover your learnings as a team including team dynamics
How you provide background, references, connections between each of the tools and how they were used.
The points on the individual elements are earned for:
how well your team demonstrated that they got the concept and applied the tool.
The overall appearance and clarity of the way the tool conveys the information
Remember: a PMs job is 90% communication, and one form of communication is presenting visual information in an intuitively obvious way
For example, in the WBS, if the Work Packages are truly assignable and schedule-able and budget-able, and the appearance and format are aligned with what we presented in class, and it does contain the full scope of both the product and the project, and it is very well-drawn (looks pleasing) it can gain all 4 points.
Im sure you see from the table that the single largest element is the way in which the entire collection is organized, presented, and supported (shown in bold above).
If the team provides only a zipped collection of files for the elements, they dont gain too many points here.
Here are the attributes that build towards a perfect 7 out of 7 for this last element.
Introductory text: a paragraph or two with references if possible to let the reader know what they are about to see and why it is important. This should occur before each of the elements above.
Connective tissue in the introductory text of each element, and/or at the end, in a Summary paragraph, the team covers how the elements (which represent scope, schedule, cost, and possibly risk, communications, stakeholder management) depend on each other and interact
Structure organized in a logical, easy-to-understand manner
Clear use of English, reasonably good grammar, at least so as to be not-distracting
References, appendices to help support the projects charter and objectives, and importance
Connectivity to Benefits Realization, sustainability
QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50: The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50: The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately. Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50: The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples. The answer is complete. 50 points: The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples. No aspects of the required answer are missing. Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points: Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points: Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points: References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated. Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points: Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors. There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points: Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented. APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment. Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20: The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors 10 points out 20: The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20: The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points: The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free. Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points: Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements. The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
GET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!
Tired of getting an average grade in all your school assignments, projects, essays, and homework? Try us today for all your academic schoolwork needs. We are among the most trusted and recognized professional writing services in the market.
We provide unique, original and plagiarism-free high quality academic, homework, assignments and essay submissions for all our clients. At our company, we capitalize on producing A+ Grades for all our clients and also ensure that you have smooth academic progress in all your school term and semesters.
High-quality academic submissions, A 100% plagiarism-free submission, Meet even the most urgent deadlines, Provide our services to you at the most competitive rates in the market, Give you free revisions until you meet your desired grades and Provide you with 24/7 customer support service via calls or live chats.